نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشکده ادبیات، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Intertextual studies are oneof the approaches to the criticism of literary works,Among the views of Saussure,Bakhtin,Barthes and Kristeva, Kristeva's theory of triple negations was used asthe basis for the present study due to the importance ofhistory in the three-sided triangle of understanding aliterary work(language, historysubject).He defines all textual relationsin a macro-domainof intertextuality,focusing on co-textual relations, and presents three rules in intertextual analysis:partial negation,in which the present text brings in a part of the absent text without innovatio r originality;parallel negation is the relationship between the present text and the absent text insuchaway that a compromise is established between the two texts and the present text is consistent with the message of the absent text;total negation" is the highest levelof intertextual relations, in which the present text recreates, transforms, and transforms the absent text, and on this basis, the mental position of the creators (submissive, challenging, or transformative) can be reached. By examining 86 collections of poetry published in the last two decades, the frequency of allusion to the history of the prophets was assessed at 288. Accordingly, historical narratives about Yusuf, Adam and Moses have been at the forefront of the lyricists' attention, respectively, and the types of triple negations, in order of frequency are partial negation, total negation and parallel negation.This frequency shows that the lyricists' mental position in facing the intertextuality of the history of the prophets has been one of submission, and challenging and transforming are in the next position with a frequency close to each other.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)